The Person Is Not the Problem — A Narrative Therapist on the Story You're Living
There's a sentence at the root of everything I do, and it's the reason my practice has the name it has.
The person is not the problem. The problem is the problem.
Michael White and David Epston wrote that line into the foundation of narrative therapy more than thirty years ago, and the first time I really heard it — not read it, heard it — something in my chest unclenched. Because most of us walk around with the opposite belief stitched so deep we don't even notice it's there: that the trouble in our lives is, somehow, us. That we are the anxious one, the angry one, the broken one, the too-much one. That if only we were different people, the problem would dissolve.
Narrative therapy starts somewhere else entirely. And if you've been wondering what "people, not problems" actually means — not as a nice slogan, but as a way of working — this is it.
You are not your story. You're the one telling it.
Here's the idea narrative therapy is built on: we make sense of our lives by turning them into stories. Not lies, not fiction — stories. We take the thousand things that happen in a week and we keep some, drop most, and arrange the survivors into a plot that means something. "I'm someone who can't hold a relationship together." "I'm the responsible one." "I always ruin it."
The trouble is that once a story gets dominant enough, it stops feeling like a story and starts feeling like the simple truth about who you are. It edits your memory in its own favor. It walks into the room before you do. Freedman and Combs call this the work of helping people build "preferred realities" — and the word preferred matters, because it quietly insists there's more than one reality available to you.
So here's the metaphor I keep coming back to with the humans I work with: somewhere along the line, the problem picked up the pen. Anxiety, shame, the old fight you and your partner have had four hundred times — it started narrating. And it's a lazy, repetitive author. It tells the same story every time, casts you in the same small role, and never once mentions the Tuesday you handled the whole thing with grace.
You're not the problem. You're the author the problem has been impersonating.
Externalizing: putting the problem in the chair across from you
The practical move that follows from this is called externalizing, and it's deceptively simple. Instead of saying "I am anxious," we start saying "the Anxiety shows up." Instead of "we're a conflictual couple," we ask "what does the Conflict do when it gets between you?"
Karl Tomm described this as externalizing the problem so that personal agency can come back inside — and that second half is the part people miss. The point isn't to dodge responsibility by blaming a phantom. The point is that you cannot get leverage on something you're fused with. You can't negotiate with a fog you're standing inside. But pull the problem out, sit it in the chair across the room, give it a name and a personality and a set of tactics — and suddenly there's you, and there's it, and there's space between you where something new can happen.
I've watched a couple go from "we're broken" to "the Resentment is really good at showing up right at bedtime" in a single session, and the whole temperature of the room changes. They stop being two problems sitting on a couch. They become two people on the same side of the table, looking at a third thing together.
That's not a trick. It's a different theory of where the trouble actually lives.
Re-authoring: change as building, not repairing
Once there's a gap between you and the problem, the work becomes what White called re-authoring — and this is where narrative therapy and my whole stance on change line up.
I don't believe meaningful change is about restoring you to some earlier, better version of yourself. That's first-order change — rearranging the furniture in the same room. What I'm interested in is the kind of shift where you walk out into a room that wasn't there before. I've written about this elsewhere using the most stubborn metaphor I own — learning to ride a bike — because once your body knows how to ride, it cannot un-know it. You don't go back. You've authored something new.
Re-authoring is the same. We go looking for the parts of your life the dominant story conveniently left out — the "unique outcomes," the times you didn't lose your temper, the moment you told the truth when the old plot swore you never could. Those moments aren't exceptions to who you are. They're evidence of a story that's been there all along, waiting for someone to read it out loud.
"But is this just storytelling, or does it actually work?"
Fair question, and I'd rather you ask it than not.
Narrative therapy grew up outside the randomized-controlled-trial culture, so for a long time the evidence was clinical rather than statistical. That's been changing. A manualized course of narrative therapy for adults with major depression produced large reductions in depressive symptoms — with most clients showing reliable improvement and gains largely holding at follow-up (Vromans & Schweitzer, 2011). And in a controlled trial that put narrative therapy head-to-head with cognitive-behavioral therapy for moderate depression, both treatments produced meaningful improvement, with completers in both groups outperforming benchmarked waiting-list controls (Lopes et al., 2014).
I'm not interested in selling you narrative therapy as a cure-all — that's not how I talk about anything. But "warm, humane, and supported by outcome research" is a fair description, and I'd be doing you a disservice to pretend the philosophy floats free of evidence.
-
Narrative therapy is an approach that treats the stories we tell about ourselves as something we can examine and change, rather than fixed facts. Developed by Michael White and David Epston, it helps you separate yourself from the problem, notice the moments the problem doesn't win, and build a fuller, truer story about who you are and what you value.
-
It means talking about a problem as something separate from you — "the Anxiety," "the Conflict" — instead of as a flaw inside you. This isn't about avoiding responsibility; it's about creating enough distance to actually do something about it. When you and the problem are no longer fused, you get your sense of agency back.
What this looks like in my room
In practice, with couples and families in Louisville and the surrounding Boulder County area, it's less clinical than it sounds. We name the problem. We get curious about its habits and its history and the moments it loses its grip. We ask what you want to stand for instead — and then we hunt for the proof that you already, sometimes, do.
For the couples who come to me for a relationship intensive, this happens in deep, uninterrupted stretches rather than fifty-minute slivers, because re-authoring a story you've been living for fifteen years tends not to respect a scheduling app. For others, it unfolds over ongoing weekly work. Either way, the orientation is the same: you are not the thing we're trying to fix. You're the one we're trying to give the pen back to.
You were never the problem. You're the author. Let's find out what else you've been writing.
Take the first step toward building a stronger, more connected relationship. Schedule your Free Initial Consultation today and begin your journey toward belonging!
